If you are involved in an eminent domain, condemnation, or inverse condemnation case in the State of Texas, let the attorneys at Barron, Adler, Clough & Oddo, LLP put their combined 100+ years of experience to work for you. Our Texas eminent domain attorneys possess the legal knowledge, creativity, innovative spirit, resources and experience to help you reach a desired resolution. Contact us today through our contact form or by calling our Austin or Houston office to speak with an eminent domain lawyer.
The eminent domain law firm of Barron, Adler, Clough & Oddo, LLP has been helping clients throughout Texas for more than thirty years with eminent domain, inverse condemnation and regulatory taking cases. Our client list includes national, regional, and local landowners, landlords and tenants. Most of our cases come from referrals from our past clients and from other law firms that want their clients to benefit from counsel that only work in this narrow area of law. Through the years, our Texas attorneys have handled some of the largest and most legally significant eminent domain and condemnation cases in the state.
If you are involved in an eminent domain, condemnation, or inverse condemnation case in the State of Texas, let the lawyers at Barron, Adler, Clough & Oddo, LLP put their experience to work for you. Our Texas eminent domain lawyers possess the legal knowledge, creativity, innovative spirit, resources and experience to help you reach a desired resolution. Contact an eminent domain or condemnation attorney at our Austin or Houston office today to learn more about your case.
December 28, 2020
The Texas Tribune published an article on December 23 about ongoing issues with the acquisition of property for the federal government’s border wall project. Barron Adler partner Roy Brandys was quoted in article discussing title problems and other similar issues that have been encountered as part of the project.
September 25, 2020
The Federal Railroad Administration has released regulations in connection with the proposed bullet train that would connect Houston and Dallas. These documents collectively outline rules for the system’s signal and trainset control, track, rolling stock, operating rules and practice, system qualifications and maintenance. The documents also set the alignment that the Texas Central Railroad will follow between Dallas and Houston.
June 24, 2020
The US Solicitor General has asked the United States Supreme Court to overturn the ruling of a federal judge in Montana that invalidated a federal permit frequently issued as part of pipeline projects. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a prior request to suspend the Montana-based federal judge’s ruling. “The district court had no warrant to set aside NWP 12 with respect to Keystone XL, let alone for the construction of all new oil and gas pipelines anywhere in the country,” the US Solicitor General wrote.
June 24, 2020
The First District Court of Appeals out of Houston issued an opinion recently, finding that the HSC Pipeline Partnership, LLC pipeline company did not qualify as a common carrier and did not have the power to condemn a pipeline easement. The appellate court also held that the landowner should have been permitted to present evidence of what he had been paid by other pipelines that previously obtained easements on his property. It is currently unknown if the pipeline company plans to appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas.